Structure and spend
Campaign and ad-group roles, budgets, spend concentration, change history and whether the structure supports the decisions the team needs.
Independent Google Ads audit
Review the account before changing it. Separate confirmed issues from interpretations and testable hypotheses, then decide what deserves attention first.
An audit is useful when spend grows but the account cannot explain which campaigns create meaningful outcomes or why apparent gains disagree with sales data.
We choose a data window that reflects the account's volume, changes and conversion lag; thin or disrupted periods are labelled rather than over-interpreted.
Campaign and ad-group roles, budgets, spend concentration, change history and whether the structure supports the decisions the team needs.
Search terms, targeting, exclusions and geography, device, time or audience patterns where reporting permits; assess segments in context, not in isolation.
Strategies, conversion-action settings, primary goals and values, together with the amount and quality of signal available for optimization.
Campaign, ad and asset signals alongside landing-page and funnel observations. Separate traffic quality from post-click friction before attributing a cause.
Test the meaning of reported conversions and compare aligned Ads, GA4 and CRM definitions where access permits. Document processing and attribution differences.
Assess visible Performance Max or automated-campaign inputs, assets and outcomes, while recording the internal signals that the interface does not expose.
The handover is a decision log, not a list of red flags. Each entry shows what was observed, what remains uncertain and what a team could test next.
Agree on account goals, business outcomes, recent changes, data window and questions that the review must answer.
Trace spend, targeting, goals and visible campaign evidence; check the conversion definitions and available downstream reference.
Compare segments and post-click outcomes, mark data gaps and separate observed defects from hypotheses.
Review the findings register, dependencies, recommended tests and how to judge the next change.
A register with evidence, decision relevance, confidence and recommended actions or tests.
A clear note on goal quality, reporting differences, inaccessible views and conclusions the data cannot support.
A practical order for validation, including required conversion or CRM signals and a way to evaluate changes.
Read access is sufficient for the diagnostic. Scope supporting systems to the agreed questions; account and data access remain under your control.
Campaign management, account changes, ongoing optimization and guaranteed savings are not included. Website tag implementation and downstream CRM imports have separate scopes.
Your team can implement or test the ranked actions, preserving a baseline and a measurement check. Implementation help can be scoped after the evidence is reviewed.
No. This is an independent diagnosis with a findings register and test plan. Account changes or ongoing media buying need a separate scope.
We examine the visible goals, budgets, assets, reports and downstream outcomes. We do not claim access to targeting or auction signals the campaign does not expose.
First align definitions, dates and conversion lag. We distinguish tracking errors from expected attribution or processing differences, and mark comparisons we cannot verify.
Only where the evidence supports a decision. Where causes remain uncertain, the register recommends a controlled test and the measurement needed to judge it.
Read access covers the audit. Any later implementation needs a separate decision on permissions and ownership.
Next step
Share the account questions, conversion definitions and the results you cannot reconcile. We can agree on the review scope and required access.