Free funnel tool
Funnel Opportunity Engine
Model stage-level opportunities and estimate where a conversion change could have the greatest commercial effect before prioritizing work.
For B2B SaaS & High-Consideration Digital Businesses
Turn funnel evidence into a focused experimentation program that improves qualified pipeline and revenue decisions — not just form conversion rate. Built for B2B SaaS, technology, subscription and lead-generation businesses with measurable digital journeys and meaningful commercial outcomes.
B2B SaaS and high-consideration digital teams often have enough data to see a weak stage, but not enough decision structure to explain the friction, choose the right intervention and learn reliably from a change.
The strongest fit is a B2B SaaS, technology, subscription or lead-generation team with a meaningful digital funnel decision, access to baseline evidence and an owner who can act on the recommendation.
Strong fit
Foundation first
Operating method
A repeatable loop keeps research, measurement and delivery tied to one decision. The sequence can start with a single funnel problem or become an ongoing program.
Define the funnel, eligible users, commercial outcome and reliability of the current signals.
Combine quantitative patterns with behavioral and stakeholder evidence to explain the constraint.
Rank opportunities by expected value, evidence strength, feasibility, risk and learning value.
Choose the smallest credible intervention and a validation method suited to traffic and decision risk.
Interpret the effect, uncertainty, guardrails and downstream quality before making a recommendation.
Implement the decision, monitor durability and feed the evidence back into the next priority.
Scope follows the constraint. The work can focus on acquisition landing pages, demo and signup journeys, activation, pricing, lifecycle handoffs or a connected multi-stage funnel.
Deliverables are tailored to the agreed funnel and operating model. A focused diagnostic will not produce the same artifact set as an ongoing experimentation program.
A commercially ordered view of where friction, uncertainty and potential value concentrate.
Quantitative and qualitative evidence connected to specific user and business problems.
Testable hypotheses with rationale, evidence, expected mechanism and ownership.
Eligibility, variants, primary metric, guardrails, sample planning and stopping boundaries.
Exposure, outcome and data-quality requirements that make the result interpretable.
Decision-oriented analysis with effect size, uncertainty, guardrails and limitations.
Sequenced research, experimentation, design and implementation work tied to the active constraint.
A reusable record of hypotheses, evidence, decisions and follow-up work.
These free tools make two critical decisions visible: where the funnel opportunity may be, and whether an A/B test has a credible evidence window.
Free funnel tool
Model stage-level opportunities and estimate where a conversion change could have the greatest commercial effect before prioritizing work.
Free experiment tool
Plan sample size and duration, then evaluate control versus variant results with a transparent two-proportion method.
The exact access list follows the agreed scope. Existing data can be useful without being perfect, but known limitations need to be explicit before decisions are made.
Demo, trial, signup, qualification, opportunity and revenue stages relevant to the decision.
GA4, product analytics, tag management and experiment-platform access where those systems are in scope.
Lead quality, opportunity, closed revenue or activation signals needed to avoid optimizing only the front end.
Eligible users, current conversion rates, seasonality and recent changes for feasibility planning.
Research, recordings, support themes, sales objections and stakeholder context that can explain observed behavior.
Owners who can review, build and release agreed changes; technical implementation can be scoped separately through Growth Engineering.
Tools support the decision system; they are not the service. The existing stack is preferred when it can answer the question reliably.
Acquisition and web journey measurement
Product funnel and behavior analysis
Exposure and experiment delivery
Joined analysis and commercial outcomes
Qualification, pipeline and revenue feedback
Behavioral evidence where consent and policy allow
The engagement improves how your team finds and validates opportunities. It does not guarantee a conversion, pipeline or revenue uplift.
Adjacent commercial measurement proof
This related engagement demonstrates the acquisition-to-revenue measurement layer needed to evaluate lead quality and downstream value. It is not presented as a CRO engagement.
Case Study
An adjacent measurement engagement connecting paid acquisition with signed jobs, completed projects and revenue. This is evidence of the commercial measurement foundation CRO decisions need, not a CRO case study.
These facts describe one anonymized measurement engagement. They are not CRO uplift, standard scope or guaranteed outcomes.
Use these guides to evaluate consulting scope, testing feasibility and funnel-audit decisions before choosing an engagement.
CRO can begin as a focused diagnostic and roadmap, or run as ongoing experimentation and decision support within an agreed partnership.
Transparent starting points
Review the existing engagement models, then discuss the funnel, traffic and implementation context that determine a credible scope.
Published prices are starting points. Final scope follows the funnel, traffic, evidence and delivery context discussed with your team.
Frequently asked questions
Clear boundaries help teams choose the right starting point and avoid experiments that cannot answer the intended decision.
Build a better learning loop
Share the journey, baseline and business outcome your team wants to improve. We will determine whether the right next step is diagnosis, research, an experiment or the measurement work that makes a test credible.