Event contract
Map the actions, standard or custom event names, essential parameters and the precise point at which a lead or purchase is confirmed.
Meta event measurement
Set up the events Meta should receive from your website, test browser and server delivery where appropriate, and check that one action does not become two reported events.
The point is an event you can explain and test, within the limits of consent, browsers and available site data.
We select the delivery route that fits your site and the agreed events. CAPI is not required merely because a Pixel exists.
Map the actions, standard or custom event names, essential parameters and the precise point at which a lead or purchase is confirmed.
Review or configure the Meta Pixel path and its triggers, values and consent handling for the scoped journeys.
Implement Conversions API through an appropriate supported integration or server path when the site and permissions allow it. Identify hosting and developer dependencies.
Use the corresponding event name and event ID across browser and server copies of one action. Check that retries and distinct purchases use the correct IDs.
This is a test contract, not a sample client event. Fields and user data depend on the chosen integration and consent state.
Select the events and whether Pixel alone or a browser/server pair fits the site and scope.
Configure the selected Pixel and CAPI routes with agreed parameters and event ID handling.
Run confirmed and failed user paths, inspect test events and review duplicate and matching diagnostics.
Document integration ownership, consent boundaries, evidence, dependencies and future test steps.
A scoped list of actions, trigger points, parameters and delivery routes.
Pixel and, where justified, Conversions API implementation with paired event ID handling.
Reproducible test journeys, Test Events observations and diagnostics, including any unresolved limits.
Notes on ownership, consent, retesting and dependencies on a third-party integration or server.
Work takes place in accounts you control and depends on a testable site journey.
CAPI cannot guarantee complete attribution, recover every blocked event or bypass privacy restrictions. Ad campaign, audience and creative audits, a general server-side tracking architecture and ongoing platform management are separate projects.
Use the documented test journey after site changes and monitor diagnostics. If multiple platforms or a broader data model need server infrastructure, scope that architecture separately.
Pixel sends browser-side events. CAPI sends events through a server integration. Either route needs a defined business action and validation; using both requires a reliable pairing strategy.
No. The choice depends on existing collection, site capabilities, privacy requirements and the outcomes being measured. We agree on the delivery path before implementing it.
It identifies one action across browser and server copies. Together with the event name, it supports deduplication; a new action needs a new ID.
Parameters follow the event and what the site can reliably supply. Additional matching data is considered only when available, appropriate and permitted by consent and privacy requirements.
We reproduce the action, inspect browser and server test events, compare IDs and names, and review Events Manager diagnostics. Any unresolved warning stays in the handoff.
It does not make attribution perfect. A suitable existing integration may be enough; broader server-side infrastructure is scoped separately if the site and multiple destinations require it.
Start with the event
Tell me which leads or purchases matter, how events are currently sent and what Events Manager reports. We can choose a fitting Pixel and CAPI scope.